Essay Paper on Mapp v Ohio

Mapp v. Ohio, significant court case of 1961 in which the US Supreme Court ruled that evidence obtained through illegal searches and seizures by state officers may not be admitted into criminal trials. The case involved a Cleveland lady, Dolly Mapp, who was detained for possessing obscene supplies.

Law enforcement had discovered the materials in her house during their unlawful search for a bombing expect. After her state conviction, Mapp appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing that her constitutional rights had been violated under the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution, which forbids unreasonable searches and seizures. The Supreme Court agreed and reversed her confidence.

The Mapp case applied the so-called exclusionary rule to the states. This rule provides that evidence obtained in infringement of the Fourth Amendment may not be admitted in trials. Mapp v. Ohio, important court case of 1961 in which the US Supreme Court ruled that evidence procured through unlawful searches and seizures by state officials may not be admitted into criminal trials.

The justice had significant decision to make; to either protect the rights of the accused or convict criminals at all cost. The court concluded that protecting blameless people’s rights is far more important than imprisoning criminals.

Suggesting that the due process did not defend non-specified rights or was due process permanently defined within the states. According to this case, the state of Ohio was completely justified in convicting Ms. Mapp for her ownership of pornography. Since privacy and security is not one of our basic, listed rights, due procedure does not have to apply to protecting these rights.

The Supreme Court did convict Ms. Mapp on her possession of pornographies. However, she appealed to the US Supreme Court in 1961, and the Court saw it necessary to review this matter and see what Wolf needed to be overruled. After reviewing the case, the Court ruled in favor of Ms. Mapp and the exclusionary law was developed. This rule said that illegally seized evidence could not be used to condemn a person in a court room…

This is just a free sample of the research paper, or part of the research paper on the given topic you have found at ProfEssays.com. If you feel you need professional writing assistance contact us! We will help you to create perfect research paper on any topic. ProfEssays.com – Leading custom essay and dissertation writing company and we are 24/7 open to serve you writing needs!

Don‘t hesitate! ORDER NOW!